When you follow American politics year after year, it comes right even to ask what is the address on the state of the union today. It is the opportunity (the only annual opportunity) to both sides Democrats and Republicans and for all parliamentarians to meet in a somewhat pompous and over-formalized.
We know already that the analysis that follows is always the same in the U.S. political context and present regardless of the content of presidential speeches. Those who have decided to get Obama will do, other ecstasies. It does not advance the Schmilblick. This is a predictable! I do not know if I'm getting older but I find it tiring and very little "inspirational".
And yet, there has been a small turnaround this year. The presidential camp has opted for a format that breaks with tradition. It is of the form, you might think that this is not essential, yet we can only welcome this media coup obamanesque:
In the hearing of the speech on the State of the Union Democrats and Republicans were not all on their side, they were mixed. It's so simple yet so essential. This changes everything especially for a media event also. It really geniuses Organizing for America and the Obama camp!
In this metling pot democratico Republican (or is it vice versa?), The two Johns (s): Kerry and McCain with Republican Michael Burgess of Texas in the middle or Joe Lieberman on the right
To conclude on the discourse of the State of the Union of POTUS 2011 the performance of speaker Obama is undeniable, his willingness to unite seemed sincere with or without a teleprompter he saying things with his heart and with conviction, he has shown great respect in relation to recent events in Tucson ... Everything was. It was a lesson in form and class. Personally, I'm much more inspired when I see the president concluded with the signing of parliamentary bills concrete (even if they are fatally flawed 99.99% of the time). At least it is not so much rhetoric. It was very nice speech on the State of the Union, and I will not say that it was hollow, but it's still great lines. But broadly that abound in the sense of team spirit and unity, and this is no small matter, it is much more useful than one might think!
And I can not help but parallel it with the discourse of the State of the Union in 1972 that Nixon called him as a unit (a note in passing: there were very few women in Congress has the time!): here
See also:
Speech State of the Union 2010
one year ago
PASAGE Small note: I I do not always do that my dear Nancy Pelosi is no longer there but was replaced by John Boehner's horrible!
see this
0 comments:
Post a Comment